![]() ![]() Low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction with high pressures (≥50% arterial occlusion pressure ) precipitate repetition failure in ∼14.5 fewer repetitions (95% CI -19.53 to -9.38) compared with LL-RT, whereas the use of low pressures (<50% AOP) stimulated repetition failure with ∼1.4 fewer repetitions (95% CI -3.11 to 0.37) however, this difference was not statistically significant. The meta-analysis comprised a total of 218 healthy subjects. The search identified n = 10 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Subgroup analyses were conducted for both the high and low blood flow restriction pressures. Meta-analyses of mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed using a random-effects model. ![]() ![]() A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and PEDro databases. This study explores the evidence for the effects of LL-BFR vs. Alternatively, LL-RT with blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) may accelerate repetition failure and has been suggested to be more time efficient than LL-RT. ![]() J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2021-High-load and low-load resistance training (LL-RT) performed to failure are considered effective for improving muscle mass and strength. Repetition failure occurs earlier during low-load resistance exercise with high but not low blood flow restriction pressures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cerqueira, MS, Lira, M, Mendonça Barboza, JA, Burr, JF, Wanderley e Lima, TB, Maciel, DG, and De Brito Vieira, WH. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |